Our far flung correspondents: Delaware reporting in post-AMS

November 21, 2011 at 8:37 am 6 comments

Hi. I suppose that most this blog’s followers don’t know who I am, so I’d like to take just a few of my “1,000 words or less” and introduce myself. My name is Rebecca; I’m senior—read: undergrad. I go to school in Delaware.

I’m writing to disseminate my thoughts on being a first-time AMS conference attendee in the age of Twitter and academic hipsterism.

The San Francisco AMS meeting was indeed my first national conference. I’m incredibly grateful to my institution’s music department for awarding me a decent amount of funding to help offset the cost of flying across the country and staying in a swanky hotel. I more-or-less attended the conference alone; I didn’t know anyone who had less than ten years and 3 degrees on me. I had also never been to San Francisco. Going to AMS meant a lot of “firsts.”

(Here’s the part where I talk about the things I’m supposed to pretend didn’t happen:)

I was incredibly nervous leading up to the conference. In preparation, I packed my suitcase a full week early, wrote several versions of an “elevator pitch” describing my thesis, and frequented department websites in order to match faculty names, faces, and research projects. I even wrote out the entire BART schedule for Thursday afternoon, and made sure to have exactly $8.10 to make the trip to the Hyatt. I convinced myself that everything had to be perfect to survive the conference.

I quickly learned that papers are the glue that holds the meeting together, but more celebrated conference traditions include meeting new people, catching up with old friends, and drinking lots of coffee. Since I have no musicological “old friends,” I relied on a few individuals to help me meet new ones. The conference Buddy Program is an excellent resource; I was lucky to be matched with Amusicology’s own Ryan Raul Bañagale, who served as living proof that musicologists at my school aren’t the only human musicologists out there. (By the end of the conference, I realized that pretty much everyone is a real person, but more on that later.) If I can impart any wisdom upon future first-time conference attendees, I’d strongly encourage participation in the Buddy Program. I’m also going to name names and thank my advisor/mentor/professor/more-than-occasional therapist Phil Gentry and my former professor Charles Carson for always being around when I wanted an introduction and for making sure I was surviving the conference. I could go on with more thanks to more people, but that’s not the point…

It turns out that AMS is exactly my scene. Pardon my gushing, but I found it incredibly refreshing to spend a weekend being around brilliant, kind people who share my otherwise fringe-interests. This may be old news to most of the community, but I found myself amazed by the scope of thought represented at the conference. I find it hard to believe Michael Jackson and C.P.E. Bach can be examined at the same conference, within a single discipline. Isn’t the diversity wonderful? I certainly think so.

I’ll admit that I was afraid of meeting all sorts of people who I had been hearing and reading about from the safety of my own anonymity. It shouldn’t have surprised me that the people I met were as interested in talking to me as I was in talking to them. It also shouldn’t have surprised me that I could actively participate in the conference through Twitter, which served as an equalizer. I’m only a “little undergrad,” but I comfortably held my own on Twitter. I tweeted, I replied, I re-tweeted, I got re-tweeted. Twitter made the conference feel cozy, and it was just another way I felt welcomed into the musicological community. It also made the hour-and-a-half business meeting Saturday night far more entertaining than it should have been for a somewhat clueless newbie like myself. The best part is that it didn’t feel rude; it actually enhanced the scholarly content of the conference. Go figure. In general, the musicology Tweeting/blogging world has really helped humanize a discipline that could otherwise seem incredibly daunting.

In his recent post in Amusicology, Ralph Locke mentions the “many, many papers by grad students.” I get the sense that this is something of a criticism, implying he would like to see more papers from more senior scholars. I also noticed the abundance of papers given by graduate students, but I saw it as an inspiration. If they can do it and do it well, I’ll be able to do it, too! Seeing so many student papers at the national conference makes the field seem welcoming to the scholastically green, and therefore open to new ideas. I’ll also say that there was no shortage of papers by senior scholars; I applaud the program committee for achieving what I see as a healthy balance. I’m admittedly clueless to the programming politics, but I’m impressed by the end result.

I’d like to wrap up by thanking musicologists across the country, in varied stages of their careers, for fostering a welcoming environment. I had a fabulous time at the San Francisco conference, and I’m looking forward to a lifetime of future conferences.

Entry filed under: conferences, Guest Blog, professional development. Tags: , , , , .

Guest Post by Ralph Locke – Post-AMS Ponderings: Structure of the Official Daytime Paper Sessions Thomas Adès Opera Commission announced!


  • 1. Prof KG  |  November 21, 2011 at 9:23 am

    I think you are right, the extensive use of twitter helped to democratize the conference for those of us on the younger end of the spectrum. It is something that sadly did not really happen at AMS’s sister meeting of the SEM.

  • 2. Rebecca Cweibel (@rebeccacweibel)  |  November 23, 2011 at 5:27 pm

    Thanks for publishing my post! I’ll be continuing this conversation and many others at rebeccacweibel.blogspot.com.

  • 3. Bradley  |  December 5, 2011 at 12:31 am

    Wonderful article! I attended the conference last year for the first time–also as an Undergrad–and I found the same thing. Although I don’t think that the shock and awe of seeing musicology celebrities ever really faded, it was certainly a different perspective of the discipline.

  • 4. Matthew Roy  |  August 19, 2012 at 4:54 pm

    Even though I was a second year Master’s student, SF was also my first experience. I was looking for a PhD program at the time and really appreciated the grad program meet-and-greet they set up. After the national conference, the regional meeting (PNW) was approachable enough for me to submit and give a paper last April. Very cool!

  • 5. Ryan Raul Bañagale  |  September 20, 2012 at 8:00 pm

    Hello Matthew,
    Obviously, we are a bit behind on our comments… Congratulations on the PNW paper. That was my first conference presentation as well. A great group of folks up there! Also: Nice to discover your own blog. If you want to contribute anything to amusicology, please be in touch!

  • 6. mroyivvi  |  September 20, 2012 at 9:17 pm

    Will do! I’m starting a PhD musicology program at UCSB next week. Really appreciate the blog and would love to contribute succinct articles whenever possible. How does that process work? mroy.ivvi(at)gmail(dot)com


Amusicology is an online forum for musicologists, academic or otherwise. Although Ryan Raul Banagale and Drew Massey are its founders and chief contributors, we welcome guest submissions. Please let us know if you would like to contribute a guest posting. Comments are always welcome and encouraged!

Please bookmark us or add our RSS feed.

Bookmark and Share

Twitter: Amusicology in 140 Characters or Less!

  • RT @anthonyocampo: Anti-Asian racism isn’t un-American—it’s quintessentially American. You can’t kill millions of Asians across the Pacific… Posted by Ryan 10 months ago
  • For the record, on this first day of distance learning: teaching college is way Way WAY easier than teaching elemen… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… Posted by Ryan 1 year ago


%d bloggers like this: